This page can be viewed at http://www.historycommons.org/essay.jsp?article=katrina_timeline_first_installment
By Teresa Harvey La Loggia
View the printer friendly view
DISCLAIMER: The analytical articles published on this website were written and published by “project managers” of certain investigative projects hosted by the History Commons website. Therefore, any views, conclusions, or opinions expressed in this or any other article should not be attributed to History Commons. For questions concerning an article, please contact the author(s) directly.
Contributor Teresa Harvey La Loggia has completed the first installment (approximately 400 entries) of the Hurricane Katrina Timeline. This installment focuses primarily on pre-Katrina events, up through the evening of August 29th.
Pre-Katrina Events (pre-August 24, 2005): This first installment relies quite heavily on August-September 2005 news reports for our “pre-Katrina” information, and is therefore incomplete, and quite possibly, skewed. Understandably, the current reporting has tended to report pre-Katrina information from a 20/20 hindsight perspective, and it appears that at least some reports “cherry picked” information in order to demonstrate a particular viewpoint or to support a particular criticism. This appears especially true with respect to reporting on Army Corps projects (both funding and implementation), as well as FEMA/federal policy regarding flood insurance and disaster mitigation. In future installments, we will supplement the pre-Katrina information based on primary, contemporaneous reports of particular events, in order to, hopefully, provide a more complete “picture” of the events leading up to this disaster.
Katrina Events (August 24-August 29): Our methodology for the “during Katrina” events is as follows: Our principle focus was on (1) government documents; (2) local, contemporaneous reporting (primarily from the local Times-Picayune and WWLTV blogs and websites); and (3) transcripts from TV news programs (i.e., CNN, MSNBC, Fox, NBC, ABC, and CBS). We then supplemented this contemporaneous reporting and/or official record with newspaper and other mainstream media sources. Where reports of a particular event conflicted, and/or where government documents conflicted with news reports, we have sought to explain, in notes, the conflicting information and, where possible, which reported information appears more likely than not to be accurate.
We are currently working on additional installments, which focus primarily on: